65 Comments
User's avatar
James Jones's avatar

World War 3 is ABOUT to HAPPEN 

AND TARIFF AND TRADE WAR IS ABOUT TO DESTROY THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT 

Tariff $ accrue to domestic governments to begin with but the costs are impinged upon consumers in all ‘competing’ countries. Prices increase for imported goods, sales slump, Supply chains are destroyed, goods are cut off, shortages occur, prices skyrocket, deprivation occurs in industry and jobs are lost or suspended, contracts are cancelled, supply stops, demand cannot be met, because  trade stops, tariffs are therefore not collected, domestic GDP falls because production and sales stop, taxes are not collected, governments are deprived of normal tax revenues and can’t meet own budgets, all social payments like pensions stop. Governments fall, health care systems and education crumble, all government operations cease to provide for citizens, EVERYTHING STOPS 

Domestic industries cannot always be re-tooled quickly to allow countries to Buy (Home) goods so the Promise of ‘independence’ for domestic economies is a ‘lie’ that will never come true. 

A tariff or world trade ‘war’ would put the everyday people 🌎 in very deep trouble all around the 🌍 world

Too much of the world’s capital is ‘invested’ in crypto - which has always been a Ponzi scheme at heart - and produces nothing in terms of real goods and services for the world relative to what is invested instead of being invested in industry and companies that ‘produce’ 

If crypto fails, and it will if big rich ‘investors’ start withdrawing their capital trillions and trillions upon trillions will be lost disappearing into cyberspace 

THE WORLD is in trouble because of what  is threatening - TARIFFS -  a domino effect would occur around the world as countries try to ‘protect’ themselves with escalating competing tariffs that only drive their own economies downwards 

The rich are in power - and the rest of the world would be poor in many ways, not just monetarily - the New World Order is about to take over. 

This is George Orwell’s “1984” about to happen. 

3 Superpowers ran the World of “1984”

A world of destitution, privation, and persecution at the hands of the “thought police”. People are being jailed for their opinions. That is already happening in the UK. The “Online Harms Act” is ready to go in Canada. Virtually the whole world is online and trackable and traceable. The Police are showing up at people’s doors in the UK for criticisms of the Labour Party and assorted online ‘aggressions’ in ‘words’ on Facebook. The world is ready to crumble at the hands of its own governments. 

The ‘Axis of Evil’ is massive. Government Tariffs are going to reduce the world to poverty. Oppressive governments are in power. This is the ‘New World Order’ about to happen 

The RICH and POWERFUL remain in power and and the WHOLE REST of the WORLD is POOR, not just monetarily, but in terms of everything that they can’t get their hands on in economies that are downsized to the bare minimum - complete government control of everything. 

This is the END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT COMING SOON

New Tariffs MUST BE STOPPED.

 PROTEST TARIFFS  in every country of the world. 

This is the ‘Project’ of the “New World Order”

Share this with everyone. RESTACK AND RESTACK AND RESTACK 

PROTEST TARIFFS OR WW3 ‘Trade War’ Begins

THE RICH AND POWERFUL WILL BE THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO AREN’T POOR and PERSECUTED 

AND IF I’m wrong, worldwide tariffs are halted anyway, the world remains as it is. Nothing happens. For now.

Expand full comment
Alan's avatar

You are absolutely right and unfortunately it all started with Trump and his administration. I can only say the damage is already done we will just have to embrace for the worst to come if the world reacts negatively.

Expand full comment
Canadian Returnee's avatar

This is what the majority of American swing state voters wanted.

Expand full comment
Amezaar's avatar

Yes, it may happen. But recently, Trump had a "very very good" meeting with Xi Jin Ping for about 90 minutes that contained the relations b/w China and USA.

If we observe, China's reputation is lot better and getting more better than USA. So, if war happens then USA will surely be weak as compared to China, due to the lack of alliances that are important for ones existence.

Expand full comment
JC Denton's avatar

I would certainly put India in the "playing both sides" camp, no question. The USA I'd put in a "pretending to play both sides" camp.

This is, of course, all complete and utter insanity. The elites have lost their minds and are going to drag the rest of us into Armageddon with them.

Perhaps there's some deal we could cut with ordinary people from all around the world, where we agree to bring our heads of state to the Colosseum in Rome, give them each a knife, and have them fight to the death.

Expand full comment
Giriraj Sharma's avatar

If crowns marched to the battlefield, swords would hesitate — and peace would find a permanent throne on earth.

Expand full comment
Gareth T's avatar

World war 3 will basically be the west vs the Mongolian hordes plus Islamic Middle East

Expand full comment
Drazen is my name's avatar

In the 2030ies there won't be much left the Revisionist have to fight against … most of the Western countries are demounting themselves …

Expand full comment
Alan's avatar

I see the more advanced version of the 1850 President Millard Fillmore who practiced Gunboat Diplomacy pursuit of foreign policy objectives with the aid of conspicuous displays of naval power, implying or constituting a direct threat of warfare should terms not be agreeable to the superior force. This will be the key approach for the Trump Administration. The clear signs are already evident and hubristically acted out in the White House by both Trump and JD Vance onto many visit world leaders. Eventually these actions will inspire the oppressed to retaliate in some form or another. It’s all a matter of time.

Expand full comment
Rudy Zimmer's avatar

As all the wars, this won't be necessary.

Expand full comment
BOCN's avatar

The financially stable components of the Islamic world are already tied up with the West.

Expand full comment
Kunal Patel's avatar

Nepal should be the same color as Switzerland.

Expand full comment
Nilay Ahir's avatar

Agreed!!, If the west allow Russia to win the Ukraine war, China too would soon start to bully its neighboring countries, especially Taiwan. And a defeat for Ukraine would mean that the world no longer views the West as someone they could trust regarding their security. Silently, the Ukraine war decides which way will the world go geopolitically.

Expand full comment
Hunter Hughes's avatar

A sobering forecast—feels like we’re watching 1913 unfold in high definition, only this time with nukes and AI in the mix

Expand full comment
Lucas Emoto's avatar

Yeah. We even got the global pandemic prerequisite timing right.

Expand full comment
David's avatar

I think that we may need to redraw that map: the last weeks have shown both that Europe cannot rely on the US to abide by its NATO commitments to Europe but, also, that the US should not take for granted the support of the rest of NATO in any confrontation it may have with China. To paraphrase, “we have a big beautiful ocean between us and China”, and it may well be that Europe’s interests are best served by focusing on sealing the eastern border to what is effectively a big peninsula of Eurasia. So to the extent that we are looking at theoretical big conflict, Europe may need to look only to defend itself (rather than attack) Russia (and, whilst we are thinking the unthinkable, the US?) whilst the US may need to look to defend itself against Russia and China; considering the Bering Straits and the Pacific are where the three superpowers rub together, that is a more likely flashpoint.

Expand full comment
Velociraver's avatar

EU has no need to "defend against China", whatsoever. No compelling reason to join the US in this mad pursuit of supremacy at all costs.

Expand full comment
Zoheyra Bent Bashir Borouis's avatar

Interesting points.

Let's hope everyone calms down sometime in the near future. To throw at each other hi tech objects may look fancy until all is left is rocks... Which is essentially what supposedly highly trained people are contemplating in the end. Have we really moved on from the stone age?

Expand full comment
Carl McNulty's avatar

Why would America play both sides?

Expand full comment
B. E. Gordon's avatar

It would depend on who is in control in the US at the time of the war, if there is one. If Democrats retake power, the US would be dark blue. If Trump/MAGA holds on, it might actually have a rapprochement with Russia and China, and be light red.

Alternatively, the purple means the US will be hostile to China but neutral vs Russia, if the China hawks in the Trump admin seize control from the doves.

Expand full comment
Carl McNulty's avatar

That makes sense, although if the US is making amends with Russia and China I doubt there'd be a multinational war to begin with.

Expand full comment
B. E. Gordon's avatar

Judging from the woke fever swamps, they’re all saying that NATO/Europe totally doesn’t need the US when it comes to defense, Canada could totally take on the US if we invaded, the US is a corrupt joke moving against “democracy” and towards “authoritarianism”, and so on.

Putting it another way, the woke crowd are repeating the exact same lines they have been about Russia and Ukraine, except substituting the US and Canada/Greenland/EU. It doesn’t matter if it’s true or not, any more than it did with Ukraine.

Based on this, I’d say there’s a non-minuscule chance of a U.S.-NATO war in the next twenty years. Higher if the China hawks in the US are successfully suppressed and sidelined. Russia and China won’t assist directly any more than China has in Ukraine.

Expand full comment
Carl McNulty's avatar

Interesting, NATO is our puppet so I don't think we'll have a war, however I could see us cutting our losses with our puppet if they find themselves in a war of their own.

Expand full comment
B. E. Gordon's avatar

I think of NATO a bit differently: that it's a liberal woke globalist protection racket, not a US puppet per se. Its being a "US puppet" is a misleading impression contingent on liberal woke globalists being in control of the US.

If they're not, as apparently now, then NATO will show plenty of independence, or more correctly being more of an EU/UK puppet. I wouldn't be surprised if, for example, NATO expels the US or the US leaves, and then NATO admits Ukraine, especially if the Democrats further implode and demonstrate they have no chance of regaining control in 2028, and Zelensky hangs on.

Expand full comment
Carl McNulty's avatar

NATO exists to keep America in, Russia out, and Germany down, according to it's first leader. I wouldn't describe NATO as independent now, the puppets from the old Liberal regime are just still in charge, I imagine we'll see some more agreeable puppets soon, both to MAGA and Europeans.

Expand full comment
Unacceptable Bob's avatar

Because America is weak?

Expand full comment
Luke's avatar

America is stronger right now than any of the countries on this list. In ten years, even in a pessimistic scenario, it will be stronger than the vast majority. This is not a good explanation.

Expand full comment
Unacceptable Bob's avatar

Stronger in what?

Russia has shown US military hardware to be pricey yet less than impressive.

US doesn't have the industrial capacity to produce artillery shells, artillery, tanks, boring infantry stuff, etc.

US lagging the OECD in various health metrics, education, infrastructure, and quality of life.

US GDP too concentrated in finance and personal consumption; has become too dependent on imports.

US political class hopelessly corrupt and incompetent.

If ignorance = strength then indeed, the US is #1.

Expand full comment
Luke's avatar

Your argument is fucking retarded. Canada and Mexico are shown as not sitting the war out. You think America is weaker than Canada and Mexico? Do you have a functioning brain? If you’re going to give a single explanatory cause for why America sits it out, it needs to have EXPLANATORY POWER, which means other countries that meet that criteria would also have to sit the war out, and that’s if I accept your stupid premise that America is a militarily weak nation when everyone in the world knows that it’s a military superpower, even if on the decline.

Expand full comment
Unacceptable Bob's avatar

You have trouble understanding the meaning of “play both sides”?

There are idiotic wars that the US will instigate but not participate in because they are weak. Ukraine was the latest example.

Expand full comment
Carl McNulty's avatar

I would argue that would not mean the US is playing both sides, just using vassals in war.

Expand full comment
Luke's avatar

Your explanation is that Canada is going to have a larger army to send than the United States.

You’re an idiot. Your proposed answer implies that Canada will be militarily stronger than the US, which is why it picks a side and America more or less sits it out/plays both sides.

Expand full comment
deSelbybigg1's avatar

I believe you overestimate the US. Rome used to be all powerful too.

Expand full comment
Luke's avatar

Look at the list again, and realize what you are actually arguing here

Expand full comment
Velociraver's avatar

Only in terms of nuclear weapons, by any other measure, USA falls far behind.

Expand full comment
Luke's avatar

Even then, Russia never got rid of its tacnukes, and their supersonic delivery vehicles are both faster than ours and faster than our defense systems

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

Global zionists? More like global anti-zionists. And global Islam. Against Israel. Trump’s being a dipshit with NATO but at least he’s got his head on straight when it comes to the Middle East.

Expand full comment
Alan's avatar

I agree to your comment, but maybe the reason his clarity on the Middle East is because Iran has attempted assassinate Trump and also see thread of a nuclear weapon endangering the Middle East.

Expand full comment